If you have been injured in an accident that was not your fault, you may be thinking about making a personal injury claim. One of the first things you will come across is the concept… What Is the Difference Between Special Damages and General Damages in a UK Personal Injury Claim?
If you have been injured because someone else acted carelessly, it is completely normal to feel confused about what to do next. The pain, medical appointments, time away from work, and emotional stress can make… What Compensation Can You Claim After a Personal Injury?
Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd is a leading decision of the House of Lords that clarifies when an occupier may owe a duty of care for damage caused by the actions of third parties. The… Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
If you have suffered an allergic reaction after eating at Papa John’s, you may be wondering whether you can claim compensation. An allergic reaction can be frightening, painful, and even life-threatening. When something like this… Can You Claim Compensation for an Allergic Reaction at Papa John’s?
Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd is a significant English tort law case that deals with negligence, causation, remoteness of damage and the application of the eggshell skull rule. The case is widely regarded… Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd
A day out at a theme park is usually full of excitement, family time, and unforgettable memories. You expect the rides to be safe, the walkways to be maintained, and the entire park to be… Can You Claim Compensation After an Accident at a Theme Park?
Smith v Land & House Property Corporation is a leading English contract law case on misrepresentation, particularly regarding the distinction between a statement of opinion and a statement of fact. The case is often cited… Smith v Land & House Property Corporation
If you live with a food allergy, you already know how important it is to check labels, ask questions, and make careful choices about what you eat. But even when you do everything right, mistakes… Can You Claim Compensation for an Allergic Reaction After Eating at KFC?
Smith v Hughes is a leading English contract law case concerning mistake, the objective test of agreement, and the principle of caveat emptor (buyer beware). It is frequently cited for establishing that a contract is… Smith v Hughes
Food allergies are not just inconvenient — they can be life-threatening. When you dine out, you place your trust in the restaurant to tell you exactly what is in your food. But what happens when… Can You Claim Compensation for an Allergic Reaction in a Restaurant?